Is your Java ready for attacks in the AI era?
The time to exploit keeps shrinking, and AI is helping attackers further. We will arrange a free risk assessment: in as little as a few days you can see where your Java estate is most exposed and what to fix first.
Free
no obligation and nothing you have to buy
- Personalized dashboard in as little as a few days
- All it takes is an overview of Java versions and quantities: anonymized, no names
- Covers Java from every vendor, not just Azul
- Everything goes through us: Solutia is your contact
Why it matters now
According to Azul, agentic AI is fundamentally changing the security landscape, and Java is not immune: even low-risk vulnerabilities can be chained into working exploits within hours.
M-Trends estimates mean time to exploit at −7 days: exploitation routinely starts before a patch ships. The figure covers vulnerabilities in general.
Source: M-Trends 2026
The median time to full remediation of CISA KEV vulnerabilities, from detection. A year earlier it was 32 days.
Source: Verizon DBIR 2026
Compound quarterly growth in OpenJDK vulnerabilities over the past two years.
Source: Azul analysis of OpenJDK quarterly releases, Oct 2024 to Oct 2026
- The quarterly patch cycle was designed for a slower attacker. Waiting for the next window may no longer be enough.
- A system behind a firewall is not automatically safe, and audit requirements are still catching up with how fast the risk is growing.
What a typical assessment reveals
Most organizations do not know exactly what runs in their Java estate. The assessment turns that into concrete data.
2–3 Java versions
According to Azul, in most organizations just a handful of versions often account for the bulk of the risk. That makes remediation more manageable than it first appears.
Licensing and security obligations
Which versions and installations carry obligations that often go untracked. This helps with audit readiness and can also save on license costs.
Versions below the current patch level
Which versions are below the current Critical Patch Update (CPU) baseline, with known but fixable vulnerabilities.
Vulnerabilities with known exploitation (KEV)
Which versions are exposed to vulnerabilities from the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog of the US agency CISA. Azul treats them as a highest-priority threat class.
End-of-life versions in production
Whether unsupported versions such as Java 5, 6, or 7 run in production, representing concentrated operational, security, and regulatory risk.
What the output can look like
A view of your entire Java estate by risk tier, vendor, and version, readable for both engineers and management.
Total JVMs
5,924
across hosts
Oracle JVMs
704
11.9% of total
Critical risk
1,187
20.0% of total
High risk
1,683
28.4% of total
Medium risk
108
1.8% of total
KEV exposure
1,187
instances affected
Illustrative figures from Azul's sample dashboard. Your results will reflect your own environment.
What you get
Facts you can act on, not another generic list of recommendations.
Executive dashboard
A visual summary of your entire Java estate by risk tier, vendor, and Java version.
KEV and CVE exposure analysis
Deployed versions cross-referenced against the CISA KEV catalog and the US National Vulnerability Database to surface real threats, not just theoretical ones.
Risk by version
Which specific Java versions drive your exposure, so you can focus remediation where it has the most effect.
End-of-life runtime overview
Which end-of-life versions run and in how many instances, both a security gap and a compliance risk.
Patch gap overview
How far deployed versions are from the current CPU level, and what risk inaction carries.
Prioritized roadmap
Concrete next steps ranked by impact: what to patch first and which runtimes to migrate away from.
How it works
Just get in touch. We take care of the rest.
You contact us
Fill in a short form and we agree on the scope.
Input data
The free assessment works from an overview of Java versions and quantities, anonymized and with no names. A report from your ITAM tool is enough. If you do not have an overview, Azul's tools can scan the environment. We will confirm beforehand what data that involves.
Evaluation
Results are checked against the KEV catalog and the NVD and ranked by impact.
Dashboard and next steps
You receive a personalized dashboard and we walk you through the results. What you do next is entirely up to you.
One contact: Solutia
You arrange everything with us. The analysis itself is carried out by Azul, by its own account the largest dedicated team of Java experts outside Oracle.
Frequently asked questions
How much does it cost?
Nothing. The assessment is free and carries no obligation.
Do we need to use Azul or be your customer?
No. The assessment covers your Java estate regardless of vendor.
What data do you need from us?
An overview of Java versions and quantities is enough. The data is anonymized, with no names.
Will it affect our systems?
If you provide the overview of versions and quantities, for example from an ITAM report, nothing runs on your side. If you have no overview and Azul's tools are used, according to Azul they run safely with no performance impact.
How long does it take?
You can have your personalized dashboard in as little as a few days.
Who carries it out?
Azul carries out the analysis. With the versions-and-quantities route, it receives anonymized data only. You deal with Solutia, who arranges everything and stays your contact throughout.
How is this different from Java Assessment by Solutia?
The free Security Assessment focuses on JVM vulnerabilities and risk. Java Assessment is a broader service that also covers licensing, costs, and a migration plan. One can follow the other.
Find out where your Java is vulnerable before someone else does
Write to us. A few details are enough and we take care of the rest.
The assessment is provided by Azul Systems, Inc. for informational purposes only. It does not constitute legal or professional security advice, Azul makes no representation that it is complete or free from error, and Azul disclaims liability for decisions made in reliance on the results.